Live broadcast, August 9th news yesterday, media person Li Xuan revealed that the Chinese Football Association apologized to Rongcheng for the blow of aixson to Qingdao’s no-square ball, and Beiqing issued a document to expose the specific situation of this incident.

Beiqing said that at the last moment when Chengdu Rongcheng vs Qingdao manatee made up for the whole match, Exxon scored a goal and equalized the score. When Wang Xihong, the second assistant referee on duty, prompted the guest team to foul Palacios handball, xing Qi, who was on duty, finally decided that the ball was invalid. Before Xing Qi made the final penalty, the VAR intervention procedure was started on the spot. In the case that VAR video information could not confirm the existence of “handball foul”, Xing Qi adopted Wang Xihong’s opinion.

Just when the Rongcheng team began to celebrate the “equalizing the score”, Wang Xihong, the second assistant referee, suddenly raised the flag. In fact, Xing Qi, the chief officer on duty, and the video referee Group all mistakenly thought that Wang Xihong raised the flag because of the suspected offside situation at the moment of scoring. However, through the intercom equipment, they learned that Wang Xihong raised the flag and thought that the Rongcheng team Palaos handball foul.

As the situation at that time was applicable to the intervention of VAR technology, the working group of on-duty video assistant referees with Ma Ning as the main member immediately started VAR verification procedure according to regulations. However, Ma Ning and others cannot clearly identify the existence of “handball foul” only through the video materials that can be viewed. In other words, through the intervention of VAR program, the penalty of the referee group on the field cannot be overturned. In other words, Xing Qi’s determination that the goal was invalid was not caused by the VAR referee group’s determination that Palacios handball foul.

It is understood that in response to the objection raised by Rongcheng club on this penalty, the referee management department of the event management conducted expert comments on this penalty after the game, and the results obtained were as follows, it is also “unable to prove the existence of handball foul”, and the penalty is misjudgment. Therefore, according to the procedure, I informed Rongcheng club of the review results and apologized for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *